The corner bearing column of the frame building cannot be more slender than the ordinary column. Therefore, the question arises: whether the requirement of the creation of a thin corner column is increased and does it have only a theoretical value. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that this requirement for tectonics to a large extent coincides with an intuitive sense of dissatisfaction that occurs at the sight of a heavy corner column. Such a coincidence of rational and intuitive assessments indicates their common origins. These estimates are based on the logic of building a beautiful tectonic form. A slender corner column is often found in structures, which should be attributed to the best samples of modern architecture.
In the frame construction, the corner column of excessively large section is inappropriate reproduction. However, there are rarely examples of good tectonic solutions of the corner of the building. It seems that the problem of shaping the angle of the frame building has not yet been taken seriously. All considered carrier columns have deficiencies have disadvantages.
It seems that the very nature of things does not allow you to find a successful and exhaustive solution of the angle of the frame building. This negative conclusion is confirmed in practice. Until now, none of the known solutions is satisfactory in terms of tectonics.
It is interesting to note that the same issues arise when solving windows. When the rows of ribbon windows in the corner of the building, it has to be solved by the same problems as when the corner column is arranged. For better interfering windows, the corner platform must be thicker than an ordinary. However, for aesthetic reasons and static calculations, he must be the most harmonious.
